A Critique of Leonard Pitts’ Latest LIES

Curt Maynard

Leonard Pitts’ is doing his best to deceive you! He thinks he can count on the power and influence of the mainstream media apparatus to bury what he really wrote about the Channon Christian, Chris Newsom murders that happened in Knoxville TN last January and the ever growing number of White Americans that are becoming increasingly angry over the mounting number of black on white crimes being committed in the United States today.For a Pulitzer Prize winner Leonard Pitts isn’t very intelligent, nor is he the gifted wordsmith his supporters would like you and me to believe he is, just look at his article, it looks as if it were put together by an eighth grader.Pitts’ is a dunce and he’s given himself away this time, in fact he’s made it entirely too easy. I’m going to show you the reader EXACTLY what Leonard Pitts’ wrote and then I’m going to show you EXACTLY how he’s trying to bury what he said and meant.Today, June 27, 2007, the Miami Herald published this article by Leonard Pitts entitled “Neo-Nutsies bring frustration, anger and – and joy.[1]” In the article Pitts’ does his absolute best to draw the reader’s attention to the fact that some neo-nazis have taken him to task for an article he wrote a few weeks ago entitled “Oppressed Whites, Give Me a Break.[2]”

In the latter article Pitts clearly called whites [NOT just neo-nazis] that are concerned about the growing numbers of black on white crimes whiners and likely racists when he wrote “But still, one occasionally hears mewling [means whining] noises from that subset of my white countrymen who feel put upon by big, bad racial minorities. This is one of those times. And Knoxville, Tenn., has become the capital city of that lunatic fringe [In other words if you’re concerned you’re a lunatic and likely a racist too].

In the same article Pitts clearly tells all whites, not just racist whites that he couldn’t give a damn about their concerns when he wrote “I have four words for them [the racist whites] and any other white Americans who feel themselves similarly victimized… Cry me a river.”

Please note that our Puliutzer Prize winnner added the inclusive “AND any other other whites who feel themselves similarly victimized,” which, if you’re white, means you and me baby. Pitts’ doesn’t care, in fact he’d only cry us a river, which is just another way of saying screw you whitey.

So anyway, on to Pitts’ latest attempt to deceive the American public. Today, June 27, 2007, our Pulitzer Prize winner wrote in the aforementioned highly deceptive piece about the Neo-Nutsies, that he’d been harrassed and threatened by a “self-professed neo-Nazi leader whose name you won't read here.” [Meaning that Pitts isn't going to let YOU know who it was]. I suggest that the real reason Pitts won’t print his name, which is Bill White by the way, is because Pitts’ doesn’t want YOU the reader to get a gander at what he actually wrote in the initial column that irked White so much in the first place.Pitts doesn’t want you the reader to do a google search on his name and Channon Christian’s name and see that there are thousands of articles and chatroom discussions denouncing HIM for HIS blatant racism, which is insurmountably worse than what he’s allegedly been subjected to by Bill White, because Bill White isn’t a syndicated columnist who words and ideas are read in newspapers from coast to coast.

Read the rest HERE